Science as Religion

Science as a Definition of Truth
Abandoned on Shore of Faith

Natural philosophy began in the Enlightenment to define the “truth” of physical reality apart from God (religion). As discussed in our last post (Evolutionary Morality an Oxymoron) scientific attempts to explain morality have been futile. This post will show that the concreteness of science is an illusion fed to the public as an antidote against religion when in fact, science is itself a religion. Thus, atheism which claims to be scientific and distinct from religion is a religion! Continue reading “Science as Religion”

Evolutionary Morality an Oxymoron

If Morality Arose from Humanity
Then Humanity Defines Morality

This is an example of circular reasoning, an informal logical fallacy. The conclusion arises from the cause and the cause defines the conclusion; the problem, one has not made a case for the conclusion based on provable premises. Unfortunately, this logical error occurs all too frequently in discussions, especially in the media where time is of the essence so various stereotypical images or types are substituted as proof for one’s forced dilemma conclusion (yes, another logical fallacy). Continue reading “Evolutionary Morality an Oxymoron”

How Feminism Was Tricked into Increasing State Power

This Corollary Should Never be Forgotten:
State Always Acts to  Increase Its Power

In the beginning there was a man and a woman. The woman was to be protected by the man. A trickster entered the screen and tricked the woman into taking an independent action that he claimed would make her independent. She did; it did not. The man saw the event, allowed it to occur, participated himself as he liked the outward result but when confronted by his superior he took no responsibility seeking to make the woman totally responsible. Sound familiar? Story of sin! Continue reading “How Feminism Was Tricked into Increasing State Power”

Goal of Feminism – NonFeminism

Nearly Everyone Can Agree With this Concept
Hardly Anyone Will Agree with its Implications

Modern feminism began as a straw man argument that unexpectedly achieved its goal of equality which was not envisioned by its early proponents, nor many of its current followers. The stated goal of equality was not well defined and what was envisioned by the elite of the early movement were hidden from the rank and file women whose goals were very different. Continue reading “Goal of Feminism – NonFeminism”

Empathy’s Goal – Tyrannical Equality

George Orwell Popularized this Term
Modern Culture uses Doublethink

Our brief look at empathy now looks at its practical application in our lives under the guise of equality. What is equality? It is the quality of being equal. What does this actually tell us about the concept; nothing! Continue reading “Empathy’s Goal – Tyrannical Equality”

Empathy as Insanity

One Definition of Empathy Capturing
Its True Essence-Man is Animal

I believe the above graphic captures the true essence of empathy which is rarely so clearly documented giving us the understanding why empathy is clearly insanity according to the Bible. Continue reading “Empathy as Insanity”

Fallacy of Nonjudgmental Empathy

Empathy has grown to such proportions
it is even used to define morality

What is empathy? In the pseudo-science of psychology the answer would be multi-faceted since empathy has grown into a tree with roots in nearly aspect of human behavior, including morality. These “professional” experts would deem any answer that we might hazard to be ridiculous and ourselves ignorant. Continue reading “Fallacy of Nonjudgmental Empathy”

How to Get People to Discriminate Against Themselves

For People to Discriminate Against
Themselves You Need a Slogan

Before discussing our topic I want to interject this snippet that succinctly emphasizes why people miss the point, usually {The paper discusses liberty and equality, topics pertinent to our discussion}. “…For one thing, the discussants are rarely very clear about what exactly their subject is, and so confusion is virtually inevitable. For another, the discussion tends to proceed by simply proclaiming principles rather than by trying to find a fundamental basis for them; consequently, the incompatible conclusions reached by different discussants are immune to rational rebuttal or qualification, again making disagreement unsurprising. Finally, discussants typically have special interests, axes to grind,which also impedes sober analysis and responsible, objective reasoning. Perhaps it is too much to hope that the treatment undertaken here will succeed where others have failed, but it is certainly worth a try.” (Liberty and Equality—A Question of Balance?). Thus, you need a good poorly defined {violates the Law of Identity} slogan so no one can be too sure what is actually under discussion {plausible deniability}. Continue reading “How to Get People to Discriminate Against Themselves”

Eugenics: Rose By Any Name

Culmination of PseudoScience
and Enlightenment Philosophy

To understand the worldview of Western culture, especially American cultural “norms”, we must attempt to understand the world through their understanding; i.e., through their worldview. However, we must have a set starting point to ensure that we do not become disoriented; there is no better starting point than the Scriptures. Continue reading “Eugenics: Rose By Any Name”

Roots of Today’s Christianity?

The Problem: Separating the Difference
Does Proximity Define Correlation?

Recently I have been studying the possible linkage between feminism and the Woman’s Klu Klux Klan (WKKK) via the respected history of Women of the Klan: Racism and Gender (Blee, Kathleen). The issue is not the inherent racism of feminism but how the WKKK was able to co-opt feminist issues into its agenda and spread the feminist agenda across America so that when the WKKK became defunct these issues of feminism had become embedded into the culture and took on a life of their own. Continue reading “Roots of Today’s Christianity?”